Skip to main content

Backend Development

Backends designed for agent traffic from day one.

sub-100msP95 API response time target for AI workload endpoints
99.9%Uptime SLA standard for production backend systems
10K rpsConcurrent request capacity on properly async, non-blocking service design
3× throughputOn concurrent LLM proxy workloads using async streaming vs synchronous calls
Start a ConversationAll Capabilities
In the AI Era

An AI agent is a series of LLM calls behind a state machine. The state machine, the queue, the database, the audit trail — that is backend. We design backends for AI workloads from day one, not retrofitted around them.

What Changed in Backend Development

Backend fundamentals have not changed: reliability, maintainability, performance under load. What has changed is the infrastructure a modern backend needs to support. Any application with AI features needs vector storage, embedding pipelines, streaming endpoints, and often an inference proxy. These are not exotic requirements — they are the new baseline.

The teams that treat AI infrastructure as an afterthought end up with embedding logic in API handlers (blocking, slow), vector queries without indexes (slow at scale), and LLM API calls without fallback (single point of failure). These are solvable engineering problems, and solving them at design time is much cheaper than fixing them in production.

···

The Database Changed Too

Postgres is still the right database for most applications. What has changed is that a Postgres schema in 2026 typically includes vector columns alongside the traditional relational schema. pgvector provides IVFFlat and HNSW indexes for approximate nearest-neighbor search on embedding vectors. For applications with under ten million vectors and standard accuracy requirements, this is the entire vector infrastructure story — no separate vector database, no new operational complexity.

The pattern: add a vector column (embedding VECTOR(1536)) to the document or content table, generate embeddings in a background job when content is created or updated, query by cosine similarity for semantic search. The similarity query lives alongside your regular SQL queries. Your existing Postgres expertise applies.

···

Go and the AI Infrastructure Backend

Go has become the language of choice for AI infrastructure components in 2026 — not because of any AI-specific feature, but because of its concurrency model and performance characteristics. Building an inference proxy that handles hundreds of concurrent streaming requests, each maintaining an open SSE connection, is a natural fit for Go's goroutine model. The same proxy in Node.js works but requires more careful backpressure management and is more sensitive to event loop blocking.

Node.js with NestJS remains the right choice for application backends where you are building CRUD APIs, managing business logic, and integrating with a broad ecosystem of npm packages. The two languages are complements, not competitors, and most production AI systems use both.

The AI-Era Backend Checklist
  • Vector schema: pgvector columns on content tables, HNSW index for query performance
  • Embedding pipeline: BullMQ job queue for async generation, idempotent on retry
  • Streaming layer: SSE endpoints with proper flush configuration and timeout handling
  • Inference proxy: routing, caching, fallback, and cost tracking across LLM providers
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry traces, Prometheus metrics, structured JSON logs
  • Migration discipline: every schema change as a versioned, reversible migration file
Overview

What this means
in practice

Backend work in 2026 covers the same ground it always has — clean APIs, solid data models, reliable async jobs — plus a new layer of infrastructure that AI features require. Postgres now needs a vector column. Your API now streams. Your background workers now run embedding pipelines. We design for all of it from the start rather than retrofitting it later.

Our standard stack is Go (Gin, Fiber) for high-throughput infrastructure components and NestJS or Hono for application backends where developer velocity matters more than raw concurrency. Every system ships with OpenTelemetry traces, Prometheus metrics, and structured logs — not as an afterthought but as part of the initial architecture. If you're building anything LLM-powered, we design the inference proxy, the vector schema, and the streaming layer before the first line of application code gets written.

What We Deliver
  1. 01

    API development in Go (Gin, Fiber) and Node.js (NestJS, Hono)

  2. 02

    Database architecture: Postgres with pgvector, query optimization, migration management

  3. 03

    Background job infrastructure for embedding pipelines and async AI processing

  4. 04

    Streaming response servers for real-time LLM output (SSE, chunked transfer)

  5. 05

    Inference proxy layers: request routing, caching, fallback, cost control

  6. 06

    Authentication and authorization architecture (JWT, OAuth2, RBAC)

  7. 07

    Event-driven architecture: webhooks, message queues, change data capture

  8. 08

    Performance optimization: connection pooling, query analysis, caching strategy

Process

Our process

  1. 01

    Architecture Design

    We define the service topology, API surface, and data boundaries before writing code. For AI applications this includes the vector schema, embedding pipeline design, and streaming layer — decisions that determine system maintainability for years.

  2. 02

    Data Model

    We design the schema with the full data lifecycle in mind: creation patterns, retrieval indexes, update frequency, and archival. Applications with AI components get vector columns built in from the start, not added as a migration six months later.

  3. 03

    Core API Implementation

    We build primary endpoints with input validation via Zod or equivalent, structured error responses, and OpenAPI docs generated from the code. No undocumented endpoints, no raw error strings leaking to clients.

  4. 04

    Background Infrastructure

    We implement the job queue for async processing — embedding generation, AI enrichment pipelines, email, report generation. BullMQ with Redis for Node.js, channel-based worker pools for Go.

  5. 05

    Integration Layer

    We wire up third-party services — payment processors, LLM APIs, external data sources — with circuit breakers, retry logic, and fallback strategies. Failures in external services do not propagate upstream to your users.

  6. 06

    Performance and Observability

    We profile hot paths, set up query analysis, configure connection pooling, and instrument with OpenTelemetry and Prometheus. The system ships with dashboards and structured logs so your team can diagnose production issues without reading source code.

Tech Stack

Tools and infrastructure we use for this capability.

Go (Gin, Fiber, standard library)Node.js with NestJS / Hono / FastifyPython with FastAPI / DjangoJava / Kotlin with Spring BootPostgres with pgvectorRedis (caching, sessions, queues)BullMQ / Celery (job queues)OpenTelemetry + Grafana (observability)
Why Fordel

Why work
with us

  • 01

    Built for long-running workflows

    Agent workflows run for seconds, minutes, sometimes hours. We design with persistent state, durable queues, and resumable workflows from the start — Postgres, Redis, and a state machine library, not an in-memory hashmap.

  • 02

    Cost and rate-limit aware

    AI workloads are bursty and expensive. We build queueing, batching, and rate-limit handling into the backend so a single bad input cannot blow the monthly inference budget.

  • 03

    Audit trails as a first-class concern

    For regulated domains, every model call, every input, every output, every human override is captured. We design the audit schema before we design the agent.

FAQ

Frequently
asked questions

When should we use Go versus Node.js for a backend service?

Go for inference proxies, streaming servers, and embedding pipelines where you need high concurrency and predictable memory overhead. Node.js with NestJS for application backends where developer velocity matters, the team is JavaScript-heavy, or you're leaning on npm ecosystem tooling. Most production systems we build use Node.js for the application layer and Go for any high-throughput infrastructure component.

What backend infrastructure does an AI feature actually require?

At minimum: a vector column in Postgres (pgvector) for semantic search, background jobs for embedding generation and indexing, a streaming endpoint for LLM output, and usually an inference proxy for model routing and cost control. These aren't optional — skipping them means no observability, no cost visibility, and reliability problems under real load.

How do you handle streaming LLM responses from the backend?

Server-Sent Events is the standard pattern. The backend connects to the LLM API, transforms the token stream, and forwards it to the client via SSE with proper flush behavior. The critical details are connection timeout configuration for long responses and mid-stream error handling — both of which break in subtle ways if you don't design for them explicitly.

How do you manage database migrations safely in production?

We use migration-based schema management (Prisma Migrate, Flyway, or golang-migrate) with every change versioned and applied in CI before deployment. Destructive operations always happen in two phases: a migration making the old thing optional, a deployment, then a cleanup migration. We never drop a column in the same deployment that stops using it.

What is an inference proxy and does our application need one?

An inference proxy sits between your application and LLM APIs and handles model routing (GPT-4o for complex tasks, Haiku for cheap ones), response caching, fallback when a provider is down, and cost accounting by feature or user. If you have more than one LLM-powered feature in production, the operational clarity from a proxy layer pays for itself within the first month of real traffic.

Selected work

Built with this capability

Anonymized engagements with real outcomes — no client names per NDA.

Energy

Industrial Energy Consumption Analytics

19%

Energy Cost Reduction

99.1%

Sensor Data Uptime

4.2s

Alert Latency

We were making energy management decisions from monthly utility bills. Having real-time sensor data and anomaly detection changed what was even possible — we caught equipment inefficiency that had been running for years without anyone knowing.

Head of Facilities Operations, Manufacturing Conglomerate

Read the case
Logistics

Real-Time Fleet Monitoring and Route Optimization

18%

Fuel Cost Reduction

96.5%

GPS Uptime

14%

Empty Mile Reduction

The empty mile reduction paid for the system within the first two months of operation. The dispatch team now has real information to make decisions from instead of relying on driver phone calls.

Operations Director, Logistics Company

Read the case
Healthcare

Clinical Alert Prioritization System

41%

Faster Critical Response

91%

Alert Precision

31%

False Alarm Reduction

The false alarm rate was a genuine patient safety issue — staff were silencing monitors as a coping mechanism. The AI layer changed the signal-to-noise ratio enough that nurses are paying attention to alerts again.

ICU Clinical Director, Regional Medical Centre

Read the case
Where it fits

The engineering
layer underneath

Backend Development sits beneath the services we sell and the agents we ship. If you are scoping outcomes rather than tools, start with one of these.

Ready to work with us?

Tell us what you are building. We will scope it, price it honestly, and give you a clear plan.

Start a Conversation

Free 30-minute scoping call. No obligation.